It is generally accepted that aspen stands in the Blue Mountains and Northern Great Basin are in an ongoing state of decline. In some cases only one or two trees remain in a stand, and it is reasonable to conclude that extensive stand loss has occurred during the last several decades. The purpose of this study is to investigate the status and trend of aspen stands in the Blue Mountains and evaluate the success of ongoing aspen rehabilitation methodologies. The primary objectives are:

  1. Field reconnaissance of existing stands in the study area with emphasis on identifying historic extent of aspen; reviewing ongoing USFS and BLM inventory work; assisting or supplementing ongoing USFS and BLM inventory work in locating stands and sites; and characterizing existing structure (including age), condition and function. 
  2. Identify and evaluate exclosures; and previous, ongoing, and planned stand treatment projects. 
  3. Obtain funding for an extensive proposal to study aspen ecology and evaluate and monitor rehabilitation methods in these unique environments. 
  4. Continue to work with all interested potential partners or cooperators, and volunteers. 
  5. Develop a progress report for the RMEF, USFS, BLM, ODFW, and BMEI that summarizes the fieldwork. 

From the stated objectives we hope to 1) develop a better understanding of the past and present status, and trend of aspen; 2) identify aspen rehabilitation methods now in use and evaluate their level of success; 3) identify factors leading to aspen decline; 4) develop a working partnership between EOARC, BLM and USFS to initiate an intensive study of aspen in the Blue Mountains and northern Great Basin that will provide managers with methodologies of rehabilitation that have a high expectation of success and increase the knowledge base of aspen ecology.
Aspen with young stand of juniper encroaching

 

Western Juniper Encroachment into Aspen Communities in the Northwest Great Basin

In the Northwest Great Basin, aspen communities uniquely contribute to the biodiversity of a semi-arid, sagebrush-dominated landscape. In this same region, western juniper is encroaching into aspen stands. Aspen stands below 2,133 m elevation were sampled in northwest Nevada, northeast California, and southeast Oregon for density, canopy cover, age, stand structure, and recruitment of western juniper and aspen. Soils and tree litter from both species were collected to analyze the effects of western juniper in areas previously influenced by aspen. Additionally, two large aspen complexes in southeast Oregon were intensively aged to determine disturbance (fire) frequencies.

Western juniper encroachment into aspen stands peaked from 1920 to 1939 with 77% of all juniper trees sampled establishing during this period. Five percent were greater than 100 years and none exceeded 145 years. Three-fourths of aspen stands sampled have established populations of western juniper. Twenty-three percent have a dominant canopy of western juniper. Twelve percent of aspen stands sampled were completely replaced by western juniper. Average density of western juniper was 1,573 trees per hectare of aspen. Seventy percent of aspen stands sampled had zero recruitment of new aspen. Within the study area aspen stands averaged 98 years old. Forty-eight percent of stands were greater than 100 years old. There was an inverse correlation between aspen canopy cover and western juniper canopy cover (r2 = .80, p = .0001).

Soils influenced by western juniper had a higher C:N ratio and pH; higher amounts of salts, lime, and sulfate; and lower amounts of magnesium, iron, copper, and manganese (p < .05). Aspen litter had a lower C:N ratio than western juniper litter (p < .05). Prior to 1870, the two major aspen complexes sampled had mean fire return intervals of 10 and 11 years. However, the most recent disturbance in either complex was 80 to 90 years ago. This lack of disturbance (fire) coupled with aspen stand decadence and low recruitment levels leaves aspen communities in the Northwest Great Basin vulnerable to western juniper encroachment and replacement.

If you are interested in this study, contact Rick Miller , or Marty Vavra.